[daip] BPASS

[Eric Greisen]

------- start of forwarded message (RFC 934 encapsulation) -------
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Received: from polaris.cv.nrao.edu (polaris.cv.nrao.edu [192.33.115.101])
	by zia.aoc.nrao.edu (8.12.9/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h52FpN2i025068
	for <egreisen at aoc.nrao.edu>; Mon, 2 Jun 2003 09:51:23 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from cv3.cv.nrao.edu (cv3.cv.nrao.edu [192.33.115.2])
	by polaris.cv.nrao.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h52FpMZ24175
	for <egreisen at polaris.cv.nrao.edu>; Mon, 2 Jun 2003 11:51:22 -0400
Received: from zia.aoc.nrao.edu (zia.aoc.nrao.edu [146.88.1.4])
	by cv3.cv.nrao.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h52FpKP22522
	for <egreisen at cv3.cv.nrao.edu>; Mon, 2 Jun 2003 11:51:20 -0400
Received: from primate.aoc.nrao.edu (primate [146.88.1.117])
	by zia.aoc.nrao.edu (8.12.9/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h52FpI2i025030;
	Mon, 2 Jun 2003 09:51:18 -0600 (MDT)
Received: (from egreisen at localhost)
	by primate.aoc.nrao.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h52FpIZ16019;
	Mon, 2 Jun 2003 09:51:18 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: primate.aoc.nrao.edu: egreisen set sender to egreisen at nrao.edu using -f
Message-ID: <16091.29302.751883.271262 at primate.aoc.nrao.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0305292035440.28044 at localhost.localdomain>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0305281501080.24276 at localhost.localdomain>
	<16084.54741.380039.246484 at primate.aoc.nrao.edu>
	<Pine.LNX.4.53.0305290805400.26583 at localhost.localdomain>
	<16086.7355.206775.968916 at primate.aoc.nrao.edu>
	<Pine.LNX.4.53.0305292035440.28044 at localhost.localdomain>
X-Mailer: VM 7.00 under Emacs 20.7.1
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-0.7, required 7,
	IN_REP_TO, REFERENCES, SPAM_PHRASE_00_01, X_AUTH_WARNING)
From: Eric Greisen <egreisen at cv3.cv.nrao.edu>
To: Phil Diamond <pdiamond at jb.man.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: bandpass problems
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 09:51:18 -0600

What parameters did you use with BPASS and what version of AIPS?

I re-ran BPASS with DOCAL true, BPASSPRM(10)=1 on the two data sets
and they get essentially identical results in POSSM - both relatively
flat.  There seems to be a difference of a few percent in the
normalization of the bandpasses between those you sent and the ones I
generated.

Eric

------- end -------