[daip] JMFIT question
Eric Greisen
egreisen at cv3.cv.nrao.edu
Thu Feb 27 13:02:20 EST 2003
Michael Bietenholz writes:
> Minor technicality:
>
> It seems to me that AIPS task CONVL, when invoked with OPCODE=Gaus on
> a clean image used to give you a warning message when it couldn't
> achieve the desired resolution set by BMAJ,BMIN,BPA. The DEC02
> version (haven't checked 03) yet, does not seem to do this anymore.
>
> In the case when the desired beam is not achievable (smaller than the
> existing one), the 31DEC02 version happily returns an image that
> claims has the new, smaller clean beam.
>
> I suggest that:
> 1) the explicit warning be put back in.
> 2) it return the correct header and flux scaling, so that the output
> image clean beam should be whatever it really was. Ie. if the
> input clean beam is 1 x 1 and CONVL is asked to convolve with
> a clean beam of 2 x 0.5, the output image would in fact be convolved
> in one direction, and have a final clean beam of 2 x 1. (The DEC02
> version's output would claim to have a clean beam of 2 x 0.5; and I
> believe flux density scaling appropriate for such a beam)
>
The DECONV subroutine was changed to help SAD, IMFIT, and JMFIT and in
the process (in 2001) the error code was set always 0. I just changed
this to count the failed axes and changed CONVL to quit if the
deconvolution is required and it fails. I think this is a better
response than trying to do something with the ill-defined values.
Eric Greisen
More information about the Daip
mailing list