[daip] forwarded message from Eric Greisen

[Eric Greisen]

------- start of forwarded message (RFC 934 encapsulation) -------
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Received: from polaris.cv.nrao.edu (polaris.cv.nrao.edu [192.33.115.101])
	by zia.aoc.NRAO.EDU (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h1QIo8Qr001552
	for <egreisen at aoc.nrao.edu>; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 11:50:09 -0700 (MST)
Received: from cv3.cv.nrao.edu (cv3.cv.nrao.edu [192.33.115.2])
	by polaris.cv.nrao.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h1QIo8i15124
	for <egreisen at polaris.cv.nrao.edu>; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 13:50:08 -0500
Received: from zia.aoc.NRAO.EDU (zia.aoc.nrao.edu [146.88.1.4])
	by cv3.cv.nrao.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h1QIo4O24589
	for <egreisen at cv3.cv.nrao.edu>; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 13:50:04 -0500
Received: from primate.aoc.nrao.edu (primate [146.88.1.117])
	by zia.aoc.NRAO.EDU (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h1QIo1Qr001539;
	Wed, 26 Feb 2003 11:50:02 -0700 (MST)
Received: (from egreisen at localhost)
	by primate.aoc.nrao.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h1QIo1418697;
	Wed, 26 Feb 2003 11:50:01 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: primate.aoc.nrao.edu: egreisen set sender to egreisen at nrao.edu using -f
Message-ID: <15965.3161.332002.974088 at primate.aoc.nrao.edu>
In-Reply-To: <BA82C787.714%imai at jive.nl>
References: <15964.5132.629130.132126 at primate.aoc.nrao.edu>
	<BA82C787.714%imai at jive.nl>
X-Mailer: VM 7.00 under Emacs 20.7.1
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-2.3, required 7,
	EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION, IN_REP_TO, REFERENCES, SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,
	X_AUTH_WARNING)
From: Eric Greisen <egreisen at cv3.cv.nrao.edu>
To: Hiroshi IMAI <imai at jive.nl>
Cc: Eric Greisen <egreisen at cv3.cv.nrao.edu>,
   Reynolds Cormac <reynolds at jive.nl>
Subject: Re: temporary literal space?
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 11:50:01 -0700

Hiroshi IMAI writes:

 > We would like to ask another updating the "temporary literal space".
 > We have developed the pipeline script, which has so many functions
 > as well as so many and long loops in the script to perform automatically
 > pipelining. Recently, the pipeline interrupted with the message
 > "STACK LIMIT" even without any wrong input parameters. The script has
 > up to 1900 lines. At first, we would like to ask whether the "STACK LIMIT"
 > comes from the limit of the temporary literal space. If so, we wish to
 > ask to extend the space. Otherwise, please let me know another possibility
 > of the trouble. Now we are processing pipelining by changing input
 > parameters and by dividing the pipelining into several sub-tasks.
 > 

The error message from the temporary literal space problem is
"BLEW TEMP K", not STACK LIMIT.

The latter comes from overflow of the control and/or value stacks -
something that is very much harder to do.  I guess we could make the
stacks larger, which will make for a largish MNJ.  I have been tempted
to try making the input buffer 132 characters rather than 80 as well
so I may try to do both together...

Eric Greisen

------- end -------