[daip] Re: question about SMOTH
Eric Greisen
egreisen at nrao.edu
Wed Aug 13 18:01:46 EDT 2003
Pat Palmer writes:
To generate a more formal reply
> SMOTH is the task I ran that said:
>
> SMOTH1: Task SMOTH (release of 31DEC02) begins
> SMOTH1: YOU ARE USING A VERY NON-STANDARD TASK
> SMOTH1: IT IS DESIGNED TO WORK ONLY ON VAXES
> SMOTH1: VERSION 2.3 - 23 JANUARY 1984
I dropped some of this verbiage...
>
> The only anomaly is that the rms went up (1.79 mJy vs. 1.18) when I
> convolved to a beam with about 6 times the area. The peak went up
> also (26.8 mJy vs 8.72), so the signal-to-noise went up, as it should
> have. (The beam are in pixels according to IMEAN is what I think it
> should be.)
The rms in Jy/beam goes up some as the beam area goes up even
more. That is normal and correct.
>
> 300 SMOTH BMAJ= 0.4285 BMIN= 0.3973 BPA= 76.6 / Input beam
> 314 AIPS CLEAN BMAJ= 2.7778E-04 BMIN= 2.7778E-04 BPA= 0.00
>
> My questions are: why did the rms go up, and what is that strange
> value for the beam (although it doesn't seem to cause any problem, I
> am curious).
>
The units are degrees when AIPS FITTP adds the AIPS CLEAN beam.
Eric Greisen
More information about the Daip
mailing list