[daip] FACES bug?

[Leonia Kogan]

Joe,

You are right. 168 is the right number. I'll change 171 for 168 at night.

Thank you for the pointing to the error.

Leonia


----- Begin Included Message -----

>From owner-daip at kochab.cv.nrao.edu Tue Feb 20 16:25 MST 2001
From: Joseph Lazio <lazio at rsd.nrl.navy.mil>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 12:18:09 -0500 (EST)
To: aipsmail at cv3.cv.nrao.edu
Subject: [daip] FACES bug?
X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 "Emerald" XEmacs  Lucid
Reply-To: lazio at rsd.nrl.navy.mil
X-URL: http://rsd-www.nrl.navy.mil/7213/lazio/
X-Attribution: TJWL
Sender: owner-daip at kochab.cv.nrao.edu
Precedence: bulk
X-Lines: 17
Status: RO

Hi,

I've been having some problems with FACES recently (31DEC01, SUL
system running the MNJ).

I discovered that my problems disappeared if I changed the value of
NPARMS passed to GTPARM.  Specifically, it was set to 171, and I
changed it to 168.  A count of 168 also agrees with the contents of
INPARM (assuming no counting errors on my part).

-- Joe

-- 
T. Joseph W. Lazio, Ph.D.        voice: +1 202 404 6329
Remote Sensing Division          fax:   +1 202 404 8894
Naval Research Lab, Code 7213    lazio at rsd.nrl.navy.mil
Washington, DC 20375-5351 USA    http://rsd-www.nrl.navy.mil/7213/lazio/


----- End Included Message -----