[daip] Possible bug in PCAL or History

[Eric Greisen]

Roger Lynds writes:

 > 	There seems to be a BIF/EIF inconsistancy between the setup of 
 > 	PCAL and the reporting of its execution in the History file.  
 > 	
 > 
 > 	is reported in the History file as 
 > 	
 > 	PCAL   BIF =  2, EIF =   2 /IFs processed
 > 
 > 	The misreporting of BIF may be unique to PCAL, as at least some 
 > 	other tasks get it right.  
 > 	
 > 	This is probably old news, as I am still using AIPS(15Oct98).
 > 	

BIF and EIF are varied inside the program as it loops and were not set
back to the full range when the HI file was written.  Corrected today
in PCAL and LPCAL.

Thanks, 

Eric Greisen