[daip] feature in GETJY

Leonia Kogan lkogan at aoc.nrao.edu
Fri Oct 13 15:10:50 EDT 2000


Claire,

I fixed the problem. The new version is at /bonito/AIPS/BUG.
May I ask you to try it. before I put it in the system?

Thank you

Leonia
----- Begin Included Message -----

>From owner-daip at kochab.cv.nrao.edu Fri Oct 13 11:04 MDT 2000
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 11:04:03 -0600 (MDT)
From: Claire Chandler <cchandle at aoc.nrao.edu>
To: daip at cv3.cv.nrao.edu
Subject: [daip] feature in GETJY
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: owner-daip at kochab.cv.nrao.edu
Precedence: bulk
X-Lines: 8
Status: RO

As far as I can tell, GETJY still uses ANTENNAS listed as negative for
deriving source fluxes, rather than ignoring those antennas as one might
hope.  At least, I get the same values for source fluxes whether I set
ANTENNAS 0 or ANTENNAS -8 (to ignore antenna 8), whereas I get different
source fluxes if I go ahead and specify all the antennas except antenna 8.

Claire



----- End Included Message -----




More information about the Daip mailing list