[daip] UVSUB feature?

[Eric Greisen]

Joseph Lazio writes:

 > Is UVSUB supposed to work in the following manner?  

         Yes

 > 
 > I had imaged a number of sources and wanted to subtract one from a
 > database.  I fed UVSUB the original data base and 0100+726.ICL008.4 as
 > the only model (NMAP=1).  UVSUB would subtract only the first 32
 > components, even though there were 170 in the CC table, regardless of
 > the settings of BCOMP(1) and NCOMP(1).  

        It subtracted the 32 components of Field 1 (class ICL001).
The naming convention is not arbitrary....

 > 
 > I then changed the name of the image to 0100+726.ICLN.1.  UVSUB
 > subtracted all 170 components.

In this case it thinks you are in the old naming convention and does
the first name as anything you say.

Eric