[asac] ASAC document
Naomasa NAKAI
nakai at msv1u.nro.nao.ac.jp
Mon Jun 12 10:46:01 EDT 2000
Dear Karl,
Regarding item 4 of the ASAC, I am sending separately (via Dr. Nakai) a draft
of planning for an enhanced ALMA and the Japanese contribution for it. I
hope it is not too late to be included in the 12th telecon.
Regards, Yasuo
==========================================================================
Plan for an Enhanced ALMA
12 June 2000
Japanese members of ASAC
Japan will participate in an enhanced ALMA project as an equal partner
as the US and European sides by bearing 1/3rd of the project. To realize
the project, we will ask the budgets of its design for FY2001 (which
starts from 2001 April) to the government in 2000 June and of its
construction for FY2002 to FY2008 in 2001 June. Our plan is that
construction of the Japanese portion finishs in FY2008, adjustments
with the US and European portions are made in FY2009 and FY2010, and
full operation for astronomical observations starts in FY2010. However
the detailed schedule will be decided under nagotiation with the US and
Europe and we keep in step with the other partners.
Dr R.L.Brown asked ASAC prioritizing the plan of an enhanced ALMA on
May 12 to send a report to AEC until June 23. According to this seeking,
we have made the following plan for the enhanced ALMA on the basis of
science return and construction cost and present it here to ASAC for
discussion. Boundary conditions considered for the plan is
.that the total cost or "value" of the enhanced ALMA is $552M/2 x 3 =
$828M,
.that the costs (values) of the parts follow the estimation and
equations in "PLANNING FOR JAPANESE PARTICIPATION IN ALMA" (R.L.Brown,
12 May 2000) for simplicity, except the second generation correlator
whose cost has been estimated by ourselves.
Since the cost of antennas is the biggest, its unit price influences the
total plan of the project largely. When the cost of an antenna is fixed,
we would have to re-consider the plan.
Plan for an Enhanced ALMA
1) Antennas
A number of 12-m antennas is 78. Each antenna should have enough
capability for submillimeter observations.
Science merits: Sensitivity of the array is increased by increasing
the number from 64.
A compact array of seven 6 - 8m antennas is added. The value of a
small antenna should be equal to that of a 12-m antenna.
Science merits: Since the minimum anntena spacing becomes shorter to
be 8 - 11m, capability of the array for extended sources is improved,
especially for shorter wavelengths.
Total cost of all antennas = $20M + $3.0M x (78 + 7)
= $275M
Japan will bear 1/3rd of the total number 85 of the antennas.
2) Receivers and LO
Bands 3, 6, 7, 9 which have been given first priority in ASAC in March
are important.
In addition to these bands, bands 8 and 10 are also important and should
be given high priority.
Science merits: (see attached appendix)
.Band 8 includes important lines of CO(J=4-3;460GHz), CI(J-1-0;492GHz),
CS(J=10-9; 489GHz) et al. and thus is useful for study of interstellar
matter and to see the cores of star forming clouds and inner 10 AU of
protoplanetary disks.
.Band 10 includes extremely high excited lines such as CO(J=7-6;807GHz),
HCO+(J=9-8;802GHz,J=10-9;892GHz), HCN(J=9-8;797GHz,J=10-9;885GHz)
which are good tracers of high temperature and high density gas, and
CI(J=2-1;809GHz). The band could detect redshifted strong CII from
galaxies at z = 1.1 - 1.4. In addition, the band is useful to observe
strong thermal emission from heated dusts which is quite important
and useful to observe galactic regions of star and planet formation
and external galaxies.
.By increasing the number of receiver bands to be six, many excited
lines of same molecules are observable, contributing accurate
determination of physical and chemical states of galactic and
extragalactic molecular clouds.
Total cost of receivers = [$700k + $200k x 6] x (78 + 7)
= $161.5M
Total cost of LO system = [$200k + $100k x 6] x (78 + 7)
= $68.0M
Japan will bear two of the six bands. Since band 10 needs technical
development of THz SIS heterodyne reveivers, Japan may take charge of
the band.
3) Correlator
NRAO will construct the first correlator which can correlate signals from
32 antennas.
In addition to the correlator, Japan and Europe, collaborating each other,
will develope and construct the second generation correlator which can
correlate 125 kch/IF of signals from all the antennas 85.
Science merits:
.The second generation correlator can treat all the antennas.
.The correlator can improve the sensitivity by corresponding to multi-
bits of the A/D converters.
.Its high capability for spectroscopy can observe many spectral lines
in the broad frequency band simultaneously.
.Such high spectral capability may make serendipitous discoveries which
open new world in astronomy.
Cost of the first correlator (filter+XF,32 anntennas,2GHzx8IF,4kch/IF)
= $7M (from correlator PDR)
Cost of the second generation correlator
(FX,85 antennas,4GHzx4IF,125kch/IF)
= $44M
(Cost of A/D converters will be included in the following Backend
Subsystem)
4) Others
According to the suggestion in "PLANNING FOR JAPANESE PARTICIPATION IN
ALMA" (R.L.Brown, 12 May 2000), we bring to the enhanced ALMA
.additional $30M for site development,
.additional money for backend subsystem, corresponding to the increased
number of antennas,
.increasing contributions for management, system engineering &
integration, and science support by Japan by 50%,
.additional contribution of $10M for computing subsystem by Japan,
as follows,
ALMA E-ALMA
Management $24.6M + 12.3 = $ 36.9M
Site Development 77.9 + 30 = 107.9
Backend Subsystem(IF,A/D) 32.9 + 32.9*(85-64)/64 = 43.7
Computing Subsystem 30.7 + 10 = 40.7
System Engin & Integration 21.3 + 10.7 = 32.0
Science Support 7.0 + 3.5 = 10.5
total 271.7
○ Total cost (value) of the enhanced ALMA
Antennas $ 275 M
Receivers 161.5
LO subsystem 68.0
Correlator 7 (first generation; NRAO)
44 (second generation; Japan & Europe)
Others 271.7
Total 827.2M
=======================================================================
More information about the Asac
mailing list