[alma-config]Re: borehole locations

[John Conway]

Hi,

 Probably not everyone got my suggested new bore positions
yesterday because I included a jpeg image which was too big.
to be forwared by the alma-config exploder.

 Below I list again the proposed positions 
with a lower priority for two of them as requested
by Simon.

 The figure showing the borehole locations can be
found at  http://www.oso.chalmers.se/~jconway/ALMA/SIMULATIONS/SIM15/

I have finished my report on the December pad reconnaissance- 
and include a prescription for finding pads and staking them
out using GPS, this can be found at
http://www.oso.chalmers.se/~jconway/ALMA/SIMULATIONS/SIM14/

   Happy Christmas and New Year everybody.

      John.

On Wed, 19 Dec 2001, Simon Radford wrote:

> 
> John,
> 
> Thanks for the positions. 
> 
> Please indicate which two positions are lowest priority, i. e., which two positions should be dropped if we can only do eight bores.
> 
> Simon
> _______________________________________________
> Alma-config mailing list
> Alma-config at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu
> http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/alma-config
> 


Proposed positions of new bore holes 

Slope of SE ridge 

628715 7452087 % C170 
629443 7452605 % C172 

On SE ridge 

628754 7450977 % W150 
629486 7452054 

Fingers
 
626392 7453061 % C180 
626719 7452012 % C183 
627039 7451504 % C166 

North West of 4km area 

629611 7454439 % C159 - LOWER PRIORITY 
630400 7453550 % Chan E 

Central 628590 7454000 % Zoom centre - LOWER PRIORITY