[alma-config] BOUNCE alma-config at majordomo.cv.nrao.edu: Non-member submission from ["David Woody" <dwoody at caltech.edu>]

Min Yun myun at aoc.nrao.edu
Mon Feb 7 18:07:58 EST 2000


------------- Begin Forwarded Message -------------

From: owner-alma-config at kochab.cv.nrao.edu
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2000 18:03:15 -0500 (EST)
To: owner-alma-config at kochab.cv.nrao.edu
Subject: BOUNCE alma-config at majordomo.cv.nrao.edu:    Non-member submission from 
["David Woody" <dwoody at caltech.edu>]   
Mime-Version: 1.0

>From myun at nrao.edu  Mon Feb  7 18:03:11 2000
Received: from zia.aoc.NRAO.EDU (zia.aoc.nrao.edu [146.88.1.4])
	by kochab.cv.nrao.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/CV-SOL-3.0) with ESMTP id SAA03344
	for <alma-config at kochab.cv.nrao.edu>; Mon, 7 Feb 2000 18:03:10 -0500 
(EST)
Received: from ovro.ovro.caltech.edu (ovro.ovro.caltech.edu [192.100.16.2])
	by zia.aoc.NRAO.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA00755
	for <alma-config at zia.aoc.NRAO.EDU>; Mon, 7 Feb 2000 16:03:08 -0700 (MST)
Received: from woodyspc (new [192.100.16.90])
	by ovro.ovro.caltech.edu (8.9.3/8.9.1) with SMTP id PAA24624
	for <alma-config at zia.aoc.NRAO.EDU>; Mon, 7 Feb 2000 15:03:06 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <007401bf71c0$424b3db0$5a1064c0 at ovro.caltech.edu>
From: "David Woody" <dwoody at caltech.edu>
To: "ALMA config" <alma-config at zia.aoc.NRAO.EDU>
Subject: Re: footnote to taper discussion
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2000 15:08:34 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600

The taper issue is easy if you can do the tapering by covering the full UV
disk of interest but just spend less time at the edges were you are going
to apply tapered weighting anyway.  This is what we do at OVRO for
holographic dish maps.  But it is fundamentally different to say you are
just going to skip over most or many of the UV cells at the edge.  You
need the data for "truthful" images but you just don't want as much S/N
or integration time at the edges.

Fortunately, nature is on our side in this situation.  Earth rotation
naturally
gives you ~1/BaseLine integration time for free.  So uniform coverage in
snap shot gives you 1/UV tapering in integration time if you can wait for
the longest baseline to change by one dish diameter.  Thus the UV coverage
calculations and image simulations
should cover an appropriate amount of earth rotation time to get the
weighting ALMA data will have.

The best way to present the UV coverage is using a realistic aperture
illumination function and do a proper calculation of the S/N at each
UV-pixel (~1mx1m) and accumulate the coverage as the earth
rotates.  This shows the real coverage and indicates how
well you can hope to recover the overlap pixels through mosaicing.
*****************************************************
| David Woody
| Assistant Director of Instrumentation
| Owens Valley Radio Observatory
| California Institute of Technology
| 100 Leighton Lane (PO Box 968)
| Big Pine, CA 93513
| 760-938-2075ext111, FAX 760-938-2075
| dwoody at caltech.edu
*****************************************************


------------- End Forwarded Message -------------





More information about the Alma-config mailing list