[alma-config] image library
John Conway
jconway at oso.chalmers.se
Fri Apr 14 15:45:14 EDT 2000
On Thu, 13 Apr 2000, Min Yun wrote:
>
> This is a reminder for everyone to vote on your 5 favorate images
> in the image library. Please vote by this weekend, and I will announce
> the final results next week. Again, the candidate images are found at:
>
> www.aoc.nrao.edu/~myun/mma/imaging/sil.html
>
Some nice images have been collected and it has been hard to choose;
I'm not sure I have made the right choices, but I guess that
we should choose 5 sources and start simulations.
I have had in mind some of the practical difficulties in
converting these input images into useful input FITS images, which
I found in making my earlier test images in my memos. If you
generate uv data direct from the images using FFT then you can think
that each image plays the role of the true sky brightness distribution,
per pixel area, for CLEAN deconvolutions you also need a lower resolution
comparison image with FWHM equal to the restoring beam (also for MEM
simulations with definite resolution, which is the correct approach I
think; asking what the sky is like at a given resolution is a well posed
question while if no resolution is specified I don't believe the question
is well posed).
I found that to achieve high DR and avoid aliasing needs 4 (and
preferably 5) pixels per beam FWHM of the fixed resolution comparison
image, hence in order to get sufficiently complex test images quite large
input images are needed. In addition to this some images will have to be
modified to reduce the large values which cut across the edges of the
images (e.g the filamaentary images), and finally it would be advantagous
to modify the image sizes to have 2^{N} on a side.
John.
Anyway my 5 votes go to;
Cygnus A - hard to choosewith Cas A, both similar very high
dynamic range. I choose the Cynus A image because the
Casa A image is actuall relatively small (248x249 pixels in
the .gif), even if you choose a 1 lobe version of the Cyg A
test image the size is bigger by a factor of two.
M51-Halpha - More complex than the m51CO, test set should
contain a galaxy for promotional reasons.
Crab - The Crab, G23, G111 and Oph all have similar filamentary
structures. The G111 image looks complex but is only
415 x 199 pixels, and has its brightest emisison toward thee
edge
The Crab has 760x742 pixels and has the highest
DR (500) of the filamentary images, can be a good proxy for
similar structures in CO and dust(?). To avoid 'edge
effects' would still need to massage slightly.
Mars - I think its nice to have as many quite different test images as
possible. Probaly subtract a uniform disk model from image
to make final test image, because this is how it would likely be
mapped.
10KDOTS - Again a different imaging challenge. Has an assocayed CC
extension, so the test data be created directly from that
may avoid limited dynamic range form image FFTs
May be working making a bigger version of the same image
and using that.
More information about the Alma-config
mailing list