<div dir="ltr"><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div>Dear friends at the WFC - the Regional North-American FITS Committee,<br><br></div>I am forwarding a recent message from Lucio Chiappetti, the chair of the<br></div>
IAU FITS Working Group, who is inching closer to move our committee<br></div>into obsolescence.<br></div>He has posted a revision of the voting rules for the IAU FWG and will<br></div>announce that on FITSBITS, but I thought you should have some<br>
</div>forewarning on this.<br></div>He sent one more message on the subject which I will also forward.<br><br></div>Cheers,<br><br></div> - Arnold<br><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><br clear="all"><div><div>
<div dir="ltr">-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>Arnold H. Rots Chandra X-ray Science Center<br>Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory tel: +1 617 496 7701<br>
60 Garden Street, MS 67 fax: +1 617 495 7356<br>Cambridge, MA 02138 <a href="mailto:arots@cfa.harvard.edu" target="_blank">arots@cfa.harvard.edu</a><br>
USA <a href="http://hea-www.harvard.edu/~arots/" target="_blank">http://hea-www.harvard.edu/~arots/</a><br>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
<br></div></div>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">---------- Forwarded message ----------<br>From: <b class="gmail_sendername">Lucio Chiappetti</b> <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lucio@lambrate.inaf.it">lucio@lambrate.inaf.it</a>></span><br>
Date: Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 8:46 AM<br>Subject: [Iaufec] disbandment of the Regional Committees, THIRD step<br>To: IAU-FITS Executive Committee <<a href="mailto:iaufec@nrao.edu">iaufec@nrao.edu</a>><br><br><br>Dear members of the IAU FWG Executive,<br>
with some delay I am proceeding to<br>
the next step of the procedure to change the IAU FITS WG voting rules,<br>
i.e. preparing the final draft for submission to FITSBITS.<br>
<br>
First of all I would like to know how many of the IAUFEC members are<br>
affected by the US Government shutdown. I would appreciate an explicit<br>
acknowledgment via private e-mail by Bob, Bill and Arnold that they can<br>
receive this message via the exploder, and interact.<br>
<br>
- if any one of them does not reply, the deadline to pass to the next<br>
step will be extended until they come back on line<br>
<br>
- conversely if everybody replies before the deadline of end October<br>
and we can freeze a draft earlier, we could submit it to fitsbits<br>
as soon as it is ready<br>
<br>
I have prepared a new draft taking into account the comments received so<br>
far by the IAUFWG. The revised version (with links to the older ONES) is<br>
at the usual place<br>
<a href="http://sax.iasf-milano.inaf.it/~lucio/FITS/Proposal/newrules.html" target="_blank">http://sax.iasf-milano.inaf.it/~lucio/FITS/Proposal/newrules.html</a><br>
<br>
Please note what follows:<br>
<br>
- the buttons to hide "deleted text" now hides also "comments", so one<br>
can have an idea of what the final text will look like<br>
<br>
- I received several comments agains the "co-optation" of members of the<br>
EC, and some general comments about membership of the IAUFWG, terms of<br>
service etc.<br>
<br>
I believe we should proceed quickly to the definition of new voting<br>
rules ("without regional committees") and apply them ASAP to vote the<br>
Timing WCS proposal.<br>
<br>
Therefore I strongly suggest that we confine now to this<br>
relatively simple voting rule change, and DEFER any matter about<br>
composition of the EC, nomination of FWG members, and more complex<br>
"weighted" voting rules to LATER DISCUSSION<br>
<br>
This is indicated by the text hilighted in red on the page<br>
<br>
Also (as a comment states) the introductory sentence is not to be<br>
taken as part of the voting rules, but merely describes the current<br>
composition of the EC.<br>
<br>
- I would however encourage Preben Grosbol to present a formal proposal<br>
for various "member categories" (points 5/6/7 of his Sep 23 message)<br>
and eventual "weighted" voting rules.<br>
<br>
- I would like to stress to Don Wells that I fully appreciate the sense<br>
of the 6-month rule to instigate unanimous consensus. On the other<br>
hand many people may have the impression that we are very slow to<br>
decide on anything (possibly because we are busy otherwise) ...<br>
that's why I suggested going from 6 to 3 (somebody even advocated<br>
2) months for "re-thinking" ... we could as well decrease the voting<br>
period from 3 weeks to 2 (but I guess not shorter than that because of<br>
conferences, observing campaigns, holidays ... or events like the<br>
shutdown)<br>
<br>
- concerning mailing lists, after the poll I conducted I drew a<br>
compromise among the various suggestions and will act ASAP autonomously<br>
as described at the end of the web page. So it is possible that persons<br>
who were on the mailing lists just ex officio without being currently<br>
members will receive this as the last message.<br>
<br>
Please read the page<br>
<a href="http://sax.iasf-milano.inaf.it/~lucio/FITS/Proposal/newrules.html" target="_blank">http://sax.iasf-milano.inaf.it/~lucio/FITS/Proposal/newrules.html</a><br>
as soon as you can, and give me (public replies on this mailing list)<br>
suggestions about things to change (including comments to be "disclosed"<br>
or removed) etc.<br>
<br>
Lucio<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Iaufec mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Iaufec@listmgr.cv.nrao.edu">Iaufec@listmgr.cv.nrao.edu</a><br>
<a href="http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/iaufec" target="_blank">http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/iaufec</a><br>
</div><br></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>