<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
<title></title>
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
Brian Mason wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="midPine.LNX.4.62.0511191724080.25874@mimas"><br>
Thanks Randy, Jason.
<br>
<br>
My last hot/cold in the lab, with ccb+receiver, was 19oct. At that
point I believe that we did *not* have the new cables between the
ccb+receiver-- the new cables were completed and installed only after
the Ka receiver had gone back up for spectral line commissioning. The
19oct levels showed the expected (4500 count vs cold, 12000 count vs
hot) power levels, and are summarized in a file called
ccbTsys19oct05.pdf that I think I sent to the mailing list the
following week.
<br>
<br>
Brian
<br>
<br>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
<br>
Brian Mason | office: +1(304)456-2338
<br>
Associate Scientist | fax: +1(304)456-2229
<br>
National Radio Astronomy Observatory | mail: PO Box 2
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:bmason@gb.nrao.edu">bmason@gb.nrao.edu</a> | Green Bank, WV 24944
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.gb.nrao.edu/~bmason/">http://www.gb.nrao.edu/~bmason/</a> |
<br>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
<br>
<br>
On Sat, 19 Nov 2005, Randy McCullough wrote:
<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">All,
<br>
<br>
Jason and I spent some time today sorting out the proximate cause for
the
<br>
anomalous readings seen last week with the Ka Band Receiver/CCB setup.
<br>
<br>
As you'll recall, Brian reported that, when looking at the sky, he
would expect
<br>
to see total power counts of about 2,000 to 2,500; but, instead, all
channels
<br>
seem to be setting somewhere around 14,000 to 14,500 counts.
<br>
<br>
After going through many gyrations, Jason and I determined that the new
<br>
TWINAX cable sets had actually swapped the polarity of our differential
<br>
signals going into the CCB's input ports...
<br>
<br>
Since this would make our readings appear to be "upside down" (i.e.,
<br>
"full scale" would read "zero", while "zero" would read "full scale"),
this
<br>
could easily explain the anomaly which Brian reported...
<br>
<br>
What I DON'T understand though, is how we could have possibly missed
<br>
this while conducting our "final" lab tests... Brian, is it possible
that we failed
<br>
to conduct any hot/cold tests after we introduced the new cables? I
realize
<br>
that, by then, our focus had moved to sorting out phase switch
glitches, etc...
<br>
<br>
Anyway, come Monday morning, we'll adjust the polarity of the TWINAX
<br>
cables, check (and/or adjust) the calibration of the 16 amplifier
boards; then
<br>
run through a series of hot/cold tests to verify our changes...
<br>
<br>
INSTRUMENT STATUS...
<br>
<br>
At this point, the CCB is running in the Receiver Lab (as ccblab) with
no input
<br>
ports connected; although the receiver control cable is still attached.
<br>
The "demo_client" was disabled at the end of our testing session; so
the CCB
<br>
should now be available on the network...
<br>
<br>
Randy
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
_______________________________________________
<br>
gb-ccb mailing list
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:gb-ccb@listmgr.cv.nrao.edu">gb-ccb@listmgr.cv.nrao.edu</a>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/gb-ccb">http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/gb-ccb</a>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
Hi Brian,<br>
<br>
If this is truly the case, then NEARLY everything makes sense (i.e., it<br>
would explain the "upside-down" nature of our readings on the GBT).<br>
<br>
However, regardless of this "swapped" condition on the input signals,<br>
we STILL measured output voltages (while on the GBT) from all 16<br>
amplifier boards which were extremely widespread (as opposed to<br>
being reasonably tightly grouped as we would have expected). With<br>
this one point alone in mind, once the cables are adjusted, we need<br>
to look carefully at the performance of the system as a whole while<br>
still in the lab, check and/or adjust the calibration of the 16
amplifier<br>
boards, etc., etc., etc....<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
<br>
Randy<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>