<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Apple Color Emoji";
panose-1:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
span.EmailStyle20
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style>
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">Who has responsibility for this? If IAU Comm B2, a few of us remain on that OC (and IAU is wanting feedback about what we’ve been up to). If NASA FITS Support Office, who is the responsible party? Or somebody else? Apparently you’ve considered
the issue, Dick, and I suspect most would be happy if you just went ahead and took care of this little detail
<span style="font-family:"Apple Color Emoji"">😷</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I should say that the agenda for my PDS telecon tomorrow will include a DOI for the Catalina Sky Survey data set. I’d be happy to also write the one DOI to rule them all into our data, as well. Does v4.0 reference the other DOIs you mention?<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Perhaps needless to say, the old guard would likely support publishing v4.0 in A&A or elsewhere.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Rob<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">--<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in">On 4/14/20, 1:53 PM, "fitsbits on behalf of Richard Shaw via fitsbits" wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<p align="center" style="margin-left:.5in;text-align:center"><strong><span style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:red">External Email</span></strong><o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in">Has anyone considered generating a DOI for the latest (v4.0) FITS standard document? The other versions (and the supporting papers, I guess) have a DOI by virtue of having been published in A&A. Having a DOI for
v4.0 would make referencing the latest version of the standard a bit more, uh, standard.
<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in">-Dick Shaw<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>