<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>This would need to be taken with considerable oversampling.  I
      have such data, taken quite a long time ago ...  Not sure I can
      get to it right now (but would happily offer it to any volunteer
      ...)<br>
    </p>
    <p>Rick<br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 3/30/22 14:02, Steven Myers via
      evlatests wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:C671F0FF-2EBB-471F-8448-27433327983F@nrao.edu">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      Is there a R (and/or L) complex voltage pattern map sitting around
      somewhere to look at? Rick probably also has the equivalent from
      the holography runs.<br class="">
      <div><br class="">
        <blockquote type="cite" class="">
          <div class="">On Mar 30, 2022, at 1:32 PM, Sanjay Bhatnagar
            via evlatests <<a
              href="mailto:evlatests@listmgr.nrao.edu"
              class="moz-txt-link-freetext" moz-do-not-send="true">evlatests@listmgr.nrao.edu</a>>
            wrote:</div>
          <br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
          <div class="">
            <div dir="auto" class="">
              <div dir="auto" class="">George:</div>
              <div dir="auto" class=""><br class="">
              </div>
              1. The effect I am thinking of is more like in the first
              few sentences of you second paragraph.  Source moving
              _systematically_ in the R and L voltage patterns.  The
              precise track can be written down as an expression (as
              also suggested by Steve).  It is not a source wander.  In
              general it also not a pure rotation (as you seem to
              imply).  Also, with significant pointing offsets antenna
              polarization squint matters for the kind of investigations
              done here (variation of R-L phase with time).
              <div dir="auto" class=""><br class="">
              </div>
              <div dir="auto" class="">2. CASA imaging *does* account
                for geometric effects (e.g. antenna offsets, squint,
                effects of non ideal aperture illumination as measured
                with holography, all of these as a function of time,
                etc.).  Some of these are needed, and even used for
                VLASS imaging.  Also these corrections, in general, can
                only be done during imaging (i.e., can't be done in the
                traditional pre imagining calibration step).  For
                compact sources one can approximate, I _think_, these
                corrections via transitional calibration (as in AIPS or
                CASA calibration modules) but only *after* eliminating
                pointing offsets </div>
            </div>
            <div class="gmail_extra"><br class="">
              <div class="gmail_quote">On Mar 30, 2022 12:57 PM, George
                Moellenbrock via evlatests <<a
                  href="mailto:evlatests@listmgr.nrao.edu"
                  class="moz-txt-link-freetext" moz-do-not-send="true">evlatests@listmgr.nrao.edu</a>>
                wrote:<br type="attribution" class="">
                <blockquote class="quote" style="margin:0 0 0
                  .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
                  <div class="">
                    <p class="">Sanjay-</p>
                    <p class="">I think you are describing phase
                      variation within/across the voltage pattern, and
                      the source wandering around in that.  Wouldn't
                      that be quite band-dependent?   I think Rick was
                      going to look for R/L amplitude effects which
                      might be evidence of that sort of thing.  And we
                      might expect that wander to be less
                      systematic/symmetric, probably.   Still, wander
                      around the beam, especially near zenith, is likely
                      at least a confusing factor, indeed.<br class="">
                    </p>
                    <p class="">The geometric effects I've been trying
                      to describe will operate even if the source is
                      strictly stationary (in direction) in the voltage
                      pattern.  But it is still <i class="">rotating</i>,
                      or more to the point, the antenna (and thus feed)
                      is rotating about the direction to the source in a
                      manner that is a function of mechanical
                      imperfections described by the pointing model (and
                      related effects).  This rotation causes
                      differential advance/retard of R and L phases,
                      relative to whatever phase the vp introduces at
                      the point the source pierces it (assuming stable
                      pointing).    And to be clear, CASA (nor AIPS, to
                      my knowledge) incorporates geometrical info from
                      the pointing model to correct the differential
                      rotation of the antennas (which gets interestingly
                      large near zenith).  And this would be via the
                      parallactic angle correction, which I suspect Rick
                      hasn't been applying, else we'd probably see more
                      interesting things, like more odd symmetry effect,
                      if AIPS is still using geocentric latitude for the
                      calculation (alas CASA does, too, because the
                      overall impact is still fairly small for most
                      observations, compared to likely posang errors
                      from other causes). <br class="">
                    </p>
                    <p class="">As for solving for the effects as Steve
                      suggests, we may already be doing so, e.g., in the
                      pointing model; i.e., existing terms can suffice,
                      at least qualitatively if not to scale, and maybe
                      some new term is needed...    My point is that we
                      are not doing the <i class="">peculiar</i> feed
                      rotation calibration explicitly <i class="">anywhere</i>**,
                      and so the effects thereof must show up at some
                      level in solved-for phases in the manner Rick has
                      shown (possibly, or probably, confused a bit by
                      what Sanjay describes, but not so much as to
                      obliterate an otherwise very geometric-looking
                      systematic effect), and may, in fact, be the
                      actual explanation---if the required mechanical
                      errors are significant enough to do it.  <br
                        class="">
                    </p>
                    <p class="">(**is the correlator at all aware of the
                      pointing model?  for reasons<i class=""> other
                        than </i>net path length, if even that?)<br
                        class="">
                    </p>
                    <p class="">Cheers,</p>
                    <p class="">George</p>
                    <p class=""><br class="">
                    </p>
                    <p class=""><br class="">
                    </p>
                    <p class=""><br class="">
                    </p>
                    <div class="">On 3/30/22 11:42, Sanjay Bhatnagar via
                      evlatests wrote:<br class="">
                    </div>
                    <blockquote class="">
                      <p class="">A simpler way to achieve the same
                        would be:</p>
                      <p class="">1. For deriving R-L phases, use source
                        model that includes known effects of antenna
                        pointing offsets (from pointing measurements)
                        and measured antenna aperture illumination
                        patterns.  This can be done in CASA.</p>
                      <p class="">2. I am less sure here, but since the
                        celestial source is compact, I _think_ if the
                        data is pointing offset-corrected before
                        deriving R-L phases, it will effectively achieve
                        almost the same as above.<br class="">
                      </p>
                      <p class="">sanjay<br class="">
                      </p>
                      <div class="">On 3/30/22 10:47 AM, Steven Myers
                        via evlatests wrote:<br class="">
                      </div>
                      <blockquote class=""> If the explanation is
                        geometric, then can we write an equation mapping
                        (AZ,EL) of the antenna and (HA,DEC) of the
                        source, including the various physical offsets,
                        to the observed R-L phase, and then solve for
                        these offsets using the data in hand?<br
                          class="">
                        <div class=""><br class="">
                        </div>
                        <br class="">
                        <br class="">
                        <fieldset class=""></fieldset>
                        <pre class="">_______________________________________________
evlatests mailing list
<a href="mailto:evlatests@listmgr.nrao.edu" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" moz-do-not-send="true">evlatests@listmgr.nrao.edu</a>
<a href="https://listmgr.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/evlatests" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" moz-do-not-send="true">https://listmgr.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/evlatests</a>
</pre>
                      </blockquote>
                      <br class="">
                      <fieldset class=""></fieldset>
                      <pre class="">_______________________________________________
evlatests mailing list
<a href="mailto:evlatests@listmgr.nrao.edu" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" moz-do-not-send="true">evlatests@listmgr.nrao.edu</a>
<a href="https://listmgr.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/evlatests" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" moz-do-not-send="true">https://listmgr.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/evlatests</a>
</pre>
                    </blockquote>
                  </div>
                </blockquote>
              </div>
              <br class="">
            </div>
            _______________________________________________<br class="">
            evlatests mailing list<br class="">
            <a href="mailto:evlatests@listmgr.nrao.edu"
              class="moz-txt-link-freetext" moz-do-not-send="true">evlatests@listmgr.nrao.edu</a><br
              class="">
            <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://listmgr.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/evlatests">https://listmgr.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/evlatests</a><br
              class="">
          </div>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
      <br class="">
      <br>
      <fieldset class="moz-mime-attachment-header"></fieldset>
      <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
evlatests mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:evlatests@listmgr.nrao.edu">evlatests@listmgr.nrao.edu</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://listmgr.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/evlatests">https://listmgr.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/evlatests</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>