<div dir='auto'><div>ea12 was intentionally not switching. It is back in operation since last week.<div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"> Frank</div><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Feb 12, 2019 15:34, Rick Perley <rperley@nrao.edu> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><p dir="ltr"> The 'lunacy' polarization experiment (run last December) requires
<br>
accurate gain calibration. Because the system is linearly polarized,
<br>
it's important that we use unpolarized calibrators (to simplify the
<br>
process, primarily). But which sources are unpolarized? At P-band,
<br>
most are, but some (like 3C345) are polarized at the ~2% level. Using
<br>
this source as a gain calibrator has the undesirable effect of making
<br>
the Stokes Q vanish. (I did this as a test -- and Q vanished).
<br>
<br>
So to enable tracking the gain variations (which are often very
<br>
large in our P-band system), I thought of using the switched power system.
<br>
<br>
The good news is that for most antennas, the required quantities
<br>
(PDif) are present and (after suitable filtering) can be used.
<br>
<br>
The bad news is that some antennas have non-operating, or partially
<br>
operating switched power. Here is the list of malfunctioning systems:
<br>
<br>
ea12: The PDif values are zero-mean noise on both polarizations.
<br>
PSum is present, and good. So I suppose the noise diode is not swtiching?
<br>
<br>
ea13. PDif were zero-mean noise for most of the run, but at about
<br>
75% of the way through, they sprang to life. The transition from noise
<br>
to signal was instantaneous. Following this time, all data were good.
<br>
<br>
ea20X. PDif zero-mean noise for about 70% of the run, then slowly
<br>
(over a few minutes) the values rose to reasonable levels. On the Y
<br>
polarization, there were recognizeable values, but they are very weak
<br>
(about 10% of what they should be) in all SPWs.
<br>
<br>
ea22Y The PDifs were present, but the signal was very weak --
<br>
maybe 20% of normal levels.
<br>
<br>
--------------------------------
<br>
<br>
One more item: ea24 worked well, but had a slowly changing gain
<br>
change of remarkable value -- nearly a doubling of the power -- over the
<br>
12 hours of the run. The power rose, maximized, then declined. The
<br>
maximum was bout 4AM in the morning -- perhaps an extreme temperature
<br>
sensitivity?
<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________
<br>
evlatests mailing list
<br>
evlatests@listmgr.nrao.edu
<br>
https://listmgr.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/evlatests
<br>
</p>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div></div>