Rick, <div><br></div><div>I assume that the correlator with the CBE work-around did not crash when the script was run - true? Were any correlator problems seen during the run?</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks,</div><div>Deb</div>
<div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Rick Perley <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rperley@nrao.edu">rperley@nrao.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
As part of debugging the tendency for my scripts to collapse the<br>
correlator, another 'flux density' test script was run today. This<br>
script includes L-band, so I took a careful look at the data, given<br>
Chuck's report this morning of some serious issues with the L-band<br>
receivers.<br>
The situation isn't nearly as dire as Chuck's report seemed to indicate:<br>
<br>
1) Antennas 11, 17, and 19 were out of the array.<br>
2) ea18 gives essentially no fringe power at any of the four subbands.<br>
3) ea26 is similarly weak, on RCP only.<br>
4) ea23 is also very weak, on LCP only.<br>
5) ea13's fringes are down by about half in RCP.<br>
6 Three other antennas give weaker-than-expected fringes on single<br>
IFs: ea07A, ea04A, and ea15C. However, these might perhaps be low<br>
power levels specific to a single IF.<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
evlatests mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:evlatests@listmgr.cv.nrao.edu">evlatests@listmgr.cv.nrao.edu</a><br>
<a href="http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/evlatests" target="_blank">http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/evlatests</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>Debra Shepherd <<a href="mailto:dshepher@nrao.edu" target="_blank">dshepher@nrao.edu</a>><br>National Radio Astronomy Observatory <div>1003 Lopezville Rd</div>
<div>Socorro, New Mexico 87801<br><a href="http://www.aoc.nrao.edu/%7Edshepher" target="_blank">http://www.aoc.nrao.edu/~dshepher</a><br> <br> </div><br>
</div>