[evlatests] New (?) X-band RFI

[rperley]

Dan, et al.:

Looking at more data, it's clear the RFI is from a rapidly moving 
object.  The duration of the RFI is only 10 minutes or so, after which, 
all appears close to normal.

Another thing I noted:  The same RFI is seen at a higher frequency -- 
11.46 to 11.82 GHz.  It's clear that these signals are also broadband, 
and 'blocked' in frequency in a similar manner to that reported earlier, 
between 10.95 and 11.19 GHz.  The time correlation is exact -- all of 
these rise and fall in precisely the same way.  They must have the same 
origin.

Curiously, the frequency span from 11.19 to 11.46 is completely clean.

Rick

On 2021-01-26 11:19, Mert wrote:
> Hi Rick.  There is a passive-only band between 10.680 and 10.700 GHz, 
> but
> 10.7-12.7 GHz is all fixed microwave (terrestrial point-to-point) and
> space-to-earth satellite transmissions.  We (RA) do have some footnoted
> protections there, but only to the extent that their transmissions 
> might
> affect the 10.680 and 10.700 GHz band.  Those are the "hooks" that 
> Harvey
> Liszt has been using to try to prevent RFI from the new SpaceX StarLink
> broadband internet service from being too disruptive to RA.
> 
> I know that there are some fixed microwave systems in the area in the 
> "11
> GHz band", but I'd have to check on the exact frequencies.  Otherwise 
> I'd
> say that you are seeing standard GSO satellite transponders.  (StarLink 
> is
> non-GSO, so we could only be sure of a StarLink detection if we see the
> source away from Dec 0.  GSO downlinks have been in the 10.7-12.7 GHz
> band, like, forever.  30-40 MHz bandwidth per transponder channel 
> sounds
> likely.)  -Mert
> 
> 
>> In a recent run, some strong RFI, seen only short spacings only (due 
>> to
> fringe-winding and A config) was seen between:
>> 10.950 and 11.190 GHz.
>> The spectral characteristics show these to be in 6 spectral 'chunks',
> each 40 MHz wide.
>> The RFI was not seen on the (northern) calibrator, but was obvious on
> the target source, located at Dec = -5.5  So, likely a geostationary
> satellite.
>> @Dan:  Any idea what's responsible?
>> Rick
>> _______________________________________________
>> evlatests mailing list
>> evlatests at listmgr.nrao.edu
>> https://listmgr.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/evlatests