[Difx-users] New to DiFX - issues with test dataset rdv70

[Rodrigo Amestica]

if in ALMA the DRY and WET corrections are applied per antenna, how could
them be uncorrected from the phased VLBI station signal? Perhaps an average
value can be calculated for the ALMA station as a whole?

ps: I hope that my question helps for completness, without steering away
from the original posting.

On Thu, 12 Aug 2021 08:08:58 -0400 (34 minutes, 3 seconds ago), Geoff Crew via Difx-users <difx-users at listmgr.nrao.edu> wrote:
> For completeness:  an array using Calc (e.g. ALMA) for its delay model
> ends up having made these corrections; these must then be uncorrected
> in the VLBI correlation.

> On 8/11/21 11:02 PM, Adam Deller via Difx-users wrote:
> >  * DRY and WET refer to specific sub-components of the delay model
> > (the dry and wet troposphere, respectively.) You don't need to worry 
> > about those - they are just there in case for some reason a user
> > wants to undo the default calculations of these contributions to the
> > delay model in post-processing and re-apply their own. (Mostly used
> > by geodesists.) 

> -- 
> Geoff Crew
> gbc at haystack.mit.edu

> _______________________________________________
> Difx-users mailing list
> Difx-users at listmgr.nrao.edu
> https://listmgr.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/difx-users