<div class="gmail_quote"><div>Hi Eric,</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class="im"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">

</blockquote></div>
FLATN was changed to have a circular EDGSKP which you can override by setting it to a negative number - it then reverts to square.  The idea<br>
was to limit corners of FFT images which are more prone to numeric error.  You probably do not need that limitation.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>We see the difference in the documentation now. We managed to get rid of the seams between some of the FLATN'ed pointings in our final cube by setting the NOISE parameter, so it is finally all making sense!</div>

<div><br></div><div> Many thanks, </div><div><br></div><div>Kristine</div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<br>
Cheers,<br><font color="#888888">
<br>
Eric Greisen<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>*************************<br>Dr. Kristine Spekkens<br>-------------------------------<br>Assistant Professor, RMC Physics                                                                    <br>

<a href="http://www.rmc.ca/aca/phy/spe/index-eng.asp">http://www.rmc.ca/aca/phy/spe/index-eng.asp</a><br>--------------------------------------------------------                                            <br>Professeure Adjointe, CMR Physique                                                                  <br>

<a href="http://www.rmc.ca/aca/phy/spe/index-fra.asp">http://www.rmc.ca/aca/phy/spe/index-fra.asp</a>                               <br>--------------------------------------------------------                                            <br>

<br>