From ghunt at nrao.edu Thu Mar 1 14:56:05 2001 From: ghunt at nrao.edu (Gareth Hunt) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 14:56:05 -0500 (EST) Subject: [comm] Fyi: VLBA fiber initiatives Message-ID: <200103011956.OAA12477@polaris.cv.nrao.edu> For those of you not explicitly included on my list, you are obviously welcome to attend. It is unlikely that we will be able to use packet switching at the rates desired (500Mbps now, 1Gbps soon, 100Gbps? in 10 years), so we may have to concentrate on the availability of "dark fibers." Cheers, Gareth. ------- start of forwarded message (RFC 934 encapsulation) ------- From: Gareth Hunt To: Leon Abeyta , John Benson , Barry Clark , Mark Claussen , Tim Cornwell , Vivek Dhawan , Miller Goss , Jim Jackson , Peter Napier , Rick Perley , John Romney , Ken Sowinski , Dick Sramek , Jim Ulvestad , Craig Walker , Ed Childers , Frank Ghigo , Phil Jewell , Mark McKinnon , Roger Norrod , Richard Prestage , Steve White , Gareth Hunt , Ken Kellermann , Gene Runion , Anton Zensus CC: Sheila Marks Subject: VLBA fiber initiatives Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 14:32:14 -0500 (EST) People, As previously advertised to some of you, we will hold a brief multi-site video meeting tomorrow Friday, March 2 at 15:00EST, 13:00MST to review the status of fiber connectivity for the VLBA. As Ken K wrote: "Mostly the goal is to replace the various bi-lateral discussions with a multi-lateral one." Initially, I had intended this as a small meeting, but we have been encouraged by the wide interest expressed by both scientific and engineering staff. So I have explicitly invited those whom I know to be directly interested and/or to be involved in related projects. However, the meeting is not closed, so please feel free to invite others whom I may have missed. Outline agenda: NSF/ITR proposal Suggested prototype for Haystack to Green Bank Coordination with other organizations (Jive, etc.) Contact with vendors Future coordination Cheers, Gareth. ------- end ------- From ghunt at nrao.edu Mon Mar 5 18:19:33 2001 From: ghunt at nrao.edu (Gareth Hunt) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2001 18:19:33 -0500 (EST) Subject: [comm] No communications meeting tomorrow Message-ID: <200103052319.SAA15252@polaris.cv.nrao.edu> Guys, Reminder: meetings will be held as needed. I will circulate an agenda as necessary. a) Gene and I expected another response from AT&T last Friday. However, we didn't get one, so I don't have anything that we need to discuss. b) Ed will probably be snowed in (out?) tomorrow anyway. c) Ed will be in CV later this week to familiarize himself with the intranet layout with Tracy and Gene. See you next week. Cheers, Gareth. From ghunt at nrao.edu Tue Mar 13 09:51:46 2001 From: ghunt at nrao.edu (Gareth Hunt) Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 09:51:46 -0500 (EST) Subject: [comm] No communications meeting today Message-ID: <200103131451.JAA14420@polaris.cv.nrao.edu> Guys, Reminder: meetings will be held as needed. I will circulate an agenda as necessary. I think that there is no need for a face-to-face meeting today. There has, however, been significant movement on the intranet front. We did indeed get an updated quote from GRCI (AT&T) in response to some questions that Gene and I had. The bad news is that the quote is actually higher than the previous quote. Primarily, this is because of an increase in what they now want to charge us for the St. Croix link. The good news is that the business office has agreed that we should go ahead and accept this quote. If everything goes according to plan, we will issue a contract to the Department of the Interior to manage this contract on our behalf until Feb 28 2002. When is this all going to happen? Good question. We were party to an amazing exchange between our business office and the DoI contract office. It seems that they can indeed accept an NRAO purchase order. The only remaining issue is that DoI requires that they have a PO for the amount for the entire contract period. So we have to get approval from the NSF to place the order, since the total is over $100,000. (Of course, in the past, the service was billed monthly by AT&T, so there was no need for such approval. ) I have provided text to Bill Porter to use for the justification. This may take a couple of weeks. So to answer the question: at the beginning of April if all goes well. Now I have to say that this is *supposed* to transition without a hitch. However, Gene's experience is that no transition, however apparently simple, goes smoothly. So please be prepared for some "unexpected" network outages at the beginning of April. We will keep you informed of progress. Cheers, Gareth. From ghunt at nrao.edu Mon Mar 19 23:45:02 2001 From: ghunt at nrao.edu (Gareth Hunt) Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 23:45:02 -0500 (EST) Subject: [comm] No communications meeting today + news Message-ID: <200103200445.XAA26160@polaris.cv.nrao.edu> Guys, Reminder: meetings will be held as needed. I will circulate an agenda as necessary. I will be in DC at an FTS2001 meeting today and Gene is away for family reasons, so I propose that we again have no face-to-face meeting today. Some news. Nothing much has changed on the intranet situation. The progress is that the letter has actually been written and sent to the NSF over Jim Desmond's signature. The big news is that a new position has been approved in the Data Management group. This is for a communications engineer/administrator. I constructed a first draft and I will circulate it to this group for comment when I get back. Cheers, Gareth. From ghunt at nrao.edu Tue Mar 27 10:30:09 2001 From: ghunt at nrao.edu (Gareth Hunt) Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 10:30:09 -0500 (EST) Subject: [comm] No communications meeting today Message-ID: <200103271530.KAA18871@polaris.cv.nrao.edu> Guys, Reminder: We will meet on Tuesdays at 10:30 EST (8:30 MST) via video. Meetings will be held as needed. Gene and I are otherwise occupied this morning. Tracy is out sick. So no meeting face to face. Sorry for the late notice. I will send a brief update later. Cheers, Gareth.